Searching for Truth in “The Truth Project” — Lesson 2: Philosophy & Ethics — Says Who?

In Lesson 2 of The Truth Project (TTP), Del Tackett begins to establish the foundation of what he labels “The Truth Temple,” a “framework of foundational concepts.”  Two pillars of this temple are (1) philosophy and (2) ethics, both of which I believe to be absolutely essential to a profitable worldview.  Philosophy, Tackett argues, must comport with truth, which, in turn, must accurately depict reality (as discussed in Lesson 1).  Thus, there is, in Tackett’s mind, only one true philosophy derived from one true religion.  I agree.  The only problem is that Tackett assumes his philosophy—one of the pillars of his conception of a “biblical worldview”—is correct, exclusive of all others that exist within Christianity.

Tackett then quotes from Webster’s 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language.  “True religion,” Webster writes, “and true philosophy must ultimately arrive at the same principle.”  I believe this is true.  However, as I aim to show in later installments of this series, Tackett’s foundation is cracked and, ultimately, does not comport with reality as he demands it should do.  My point in bringing this up is not to tear down the pillar of philosophy, but rather to highlight Tackett’s penchant for quoting from Webster as if it were Scripture, as if Webster’s definitions were eternally valid from time to time everlasting.  (He did this a number of times in the first two lessons, and I suspect he’ll continue this practice in future lessons.)  It’s as if Tackett doesn’t recognize that Webster’s dictionary was as much of a product of its time (i.e., early 19th-century America, which was heavily influenced by Christianity) as today’s more secular Webster’s 3rd New International Dictionary.  It is Tackett’s tendency toward narrow-mindedness that blinds him to the environment from which his worldview sprung which constitutes one of TTP‘s greatest weaknesses.  (I doubt highly that Tackett even recognizes from where his own particular brand of creationist philosophy is derived.  See chapter 6 of Timothy P. Martin & Jeffrey L. Vaughn’s Beyond Creation Science.)

The truth is, the only true philosophy may very well not be Tackett’s.  It reminds me of a parenting course that my wife and I began to take (and quickly abandoned) prior to having our first child.  It is titled Growing Kids God’s Way.  How arrogant.  As if the Ezzos, who developed the approach, had finally discovered a one-size-fits-all method of parenting that God endorses, complete with allowing the Ezzos to add His name to their project.  As much as I agree with Tackett regarding the importance of possessing a correct philosophy derived from a correct religion, and as much as my ethics may align with Tackett’s, I can’t agree that Tackett necessarily possesses the correct philosophy.  The mere claim implicit in the title of Tackett’s DVD series smacks of pride.  (God knows I’ve been guilty of the same many times in my life.)

As Tackett continues the lesson, he spends a considerable amount of time drawing attention to the philosophy of Carl Sagan, focusing on his famous declaration that “the Cosmos is all there is, all there was, and all there ever will be.”  He also highlights Sagan’s equally famous quip that we humans are made of “star-stuff,” which is why our species feels so drawn to discover what I call our “solar heritage.”  “Our contemplations of the Cosmos stir us,” Sagan said, toward obtaining a greater understanding of our place in this universe, pushing us to recognize and meditate on our connectedness to everything else around us.  “Some part of our being,” Sagan continues, “knows this is where we came from.  We long to return and we can because the Cosmos is also within us.”  While neither Tackett nor I believe that Sagan’s “cosmos” tagline, nor his implicit pantheism, is correct, Tackett ridicules Sagan’s “star-stuff” comment, following it up with the anti-evolution epithet “goo-man,” referencing evolutionary biology’s assertion that human beings, along with the rest of the living world, have their origin in lower, less complex lifeforms.  Science aside, I don’t think “dirt-man” has a flagellum to stand on.  Ever read Genesis 2:7, Mr. Tackett?

Tackett then goes on to list a bunch of –isms that he believes constitute “hollow and deceptive philosophies,” such as materialism, idealism, empiricism, rationalism, naturalism, determinism, relativism, mentalism, mechanism, solipsism, subjectivism, institutionism, and hedonism.  Again, I agree that all of these –isms are hollow and deceptive, especially if not complemented by theism.  (No disrespect intended to my atheist or agnostic friends!)  One of the –isms that Tackett contends against relentlessly in TTP is atheistic humanism, represented by science historian William B. Provine, the living, breathing “straw man” that Intelligent Design founder Philip E. Johnson had been waiting for his entire life.  After playing a clip from a debate between Provine and Johnson, Tackett pounced upon Provine’s personal declaration of Darwinism’s implications, to wit, that “there are no gods or purposes, no ultimate foundation for ethics, no free will, no life after death, and no ultimate meaning in life.”  Provine is dreadfully wrong, for Darwinism implies none of those things.  Rather, Provine’s philosophical end game is a direct result of adopting an atheistic  and philosophically materialist worldview, and not a result of accepting evolution as fact.  Unfortunately, Tackett knows nothing about evolutionary biology and proceeds to take Provine at his word, holding him up as a paragon of non-virtue, and attacks the very science that I and many other Christians believe represents accurately the truth about the mechanisms by which life’s diversity arose. 

I must also take exception to Tackett’s presupposition that God has revealed Himself in only two ways.  The first method is through nature, or “general revelation.”  Score one for Tackett, for I, too, believe that God’s nature is reflected by the orderliness and beauty of the cosmos, inasmuch as we understand it accurately (i.e., correct science).  The second method, Tackett declares, is through the written Word, the Bible.  While I believe that the Bible is, in a sense, revelation from God, I don’t necessarily believe that it can provide us with a correct “worldview” when taken as a whole, especially considering that there exists, within its very pages, inaccurate scientific concepts.  If Tackett were truly bent upon adopting a worldview exclusively from the Bible, he’d join the ranks of the Flat Earth Society.  Not to the exclusion of the written Word, I much prefer to recognize Jesus Christ as a superior method by which God revealed/reveals Himself, Jesus being the God-man about whom the Bible testifies.  Only insofar as the testimonies of the New Testament writers reflect the true person of the Christ—and I believe those testimonies to be reliable and trustworthy—can we begin truly to develop a biblical correct “worldview,” one based upon the Living Word whose theology derived directly from the Father.

Lastly, I want to draw attention to something of which Tackett warns his audience:  assumptive language.  According to Tackett, assumptive language is a “powerful and deceptive use of words in which a seemingly simple statement is made, hoping the hearer will buy the simple statement without recognizing the huge assumptions that come with it.”  If I may be so bold, Mr. Tackett, you are not innocent of manipulating assumptive language, and your audience is clearly not immune to falling prey to it.  Being a dyed-in-the-wool Evangelical doesn’t mean your “goo” don’t stink.  Can I get an “Amen”?


Filed under Uncategorized

135 Responses to Searching for Truth in “The Truth Project” — Lesson 2: Philosophy & Ethics — Says Who?

  1. Thanks Mike!
    Yes, you get an "Amen" from me. Again, I want you to know how much I appreciate your commenting on this series.

  2. Argon

    There is a pretty good philosophy blogger who is discussing related topics about justifications behind moral systems here:

    Check out the 'Oppy on Moral Arguments' series.

  3. We can all be pretty narrow-minded, finding it difficult to see any other way or viewpoint. It is humbling when one changes his mind and finds out that he was wrong all along, like I was with the whole 6 day thing. Humility, even when we are convinced we are right, is an essential attitude to take.

    My wife and I also found the title of the book Raising Kids God's Way to be extremely arrogant and narrowminded. If you look hard enough, I am sure you can find scripture proofs for being very regimented with your children and for following a sort of Baby Wise method (which is my admittedly uneducated impression of that book), but you can just as easily make a biblical case for Attachment parenting, based on God's tenderness and compassion.

  4. Thomas,

    If you look hard enough, I am sure you can find scripture proofs for being very regimented with your children … but you can just as easily make a biblical case for Attachment parenting, based on God's tenderness and compassion.

    That's a great point. In fact, that's one of the reasons why I've backed away from systematic theology a bit. As I continue to read through the Bible on a regular basis, I find that it more and more difficult to accept that biblical theology can ever be systematized. There is just too much theological diversity.

    Great idea for another post down the road …

  5. Well said! You've got my Amen!

    If I might be so bold, Professor Gary Rendsburg of Rutgers U has an excellent way of looking at the seven days of Genesis. The ancient Sumerians/Babylonians were star worshipers. They knew of the Sun, the Moon, and five of the planets, which became the seven days of the week, one for each of their gods. The names for the days still hold that remembrance (Sunday for Sun, Monday for Moon, all the way up to Saturday for Saturn). The author of Genesis 1 proclaimed that it was not the seven gods of the Sumerians that created the world, but the One God of Israel. Therefore, each function that was ascribed to one of the gods was ascribed to YHWH on that particular day. For example, since the sun god was responsible for light, YHWH created light on the first day. The evidence for this is found in that the names of the days of the week do not appear in the account of Genesis, since they were gods and were detestable to the author.

  6. @Bruce:

    The author of Genesis 1 proclaimed that it was not the seven gods of the Sumerians that created the world, but the One God of Israel. Therefore, each function that was ascribed to one of the gods was ascribed to YHWH on that particular day.

    Interesting concept. Are there any online resources that discuss this particular polemical approach to the 6 days of creation?

  7. Its like you read my mind! You seem to know a lot about this, such as you wrote the
    e book in it or something. I think that you can do with
    a few % to drive the message home a bit, but instead of that, this is fantastic blog.
    A great read. I will certainly be back.

  8. There’s definately a lot to learn about this subject.
    I really like all of the points you made.

  9. Your method of explaining everything in this post is in fact good, all can without difficulty
    be aware of it, Thanks a lot.

  10. Currently it appears like Movable Type is the best blogging
    platform out there right now. (from what I’ve read) Is that what
    you’re using on your blog?

  11. Hi Dear, are you in fact visiting this website daily, if so then you
    will absolutely get nice know-how.

  12. I’m pretty pleased to find this website. I need to to thank you
    for ones time for this fantastic read!! I definitely enjoyed every bit of it and i also have
    you saved as a favorite to look at new things on your web site.

  13. hello!,I love your writing very a lot! proportion we be in contact
    extra about your article on AOL? I require a specialist on this area to solve my
    problem. Maybe that’s you! Having a look forward to look you.

  14. Very nice write-up. I certainly love this site. Keep it up!

  15. Touche. Outstanding arguments. Keep up the great work.

  16. Great blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere?
    A theme like yours with a few simple adjustements would really
    make my blog stand out. Please let me know where you got your
    design. Thank you

  17. Hi there, I enjoy reading all of your article.

    I like to write a little comment to support you.

  18. Hey! I know this is kinda off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are you using
    for this website? I’m getting sick and tired of
    Wordpress because I’ve had problems with hackers
    and I’m looking at options for another platform. I would
    be great if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.

  19. Hello, of course this paragraph is really fastidious and I have
    learned lot of things from it concerning blogging.

  20. When I originally commented I clicked the “Notify me when new comments are added” checkbox and now each time a comment is
    added I get three emails with the same comment. Is there any way you can remove people
    from that service? Thanks!

  21. Hi, I do think this is an excellent blog. I stumbledupon it 😉 I am going to
    revisit once again since I book marked it. Money and freedom is the
    greatest way to change, may you be rich and continue
    to help other people.

  22. I’m really enjoying the theme/design of your blog.
    Do you ever run into any web browser compatibility issues?

    A handful of my blog readers have complained about my website not
    operating correctly in Explorer but looks great in Chrome.
    Do you have any suggestions to help fix this problem?

  23. Thanks for finally talking about > Searching for Truth in “The Truth
    Project” — Lesson 2: Philosophy & Ethics — Says Who?
    | Rethinking the αlpha and Ωmega < Liked it!

  24. Hi there to every one, it’s really a nice for me to visit this web page, it consists of
    priceless Information.

  25. I all the time used to study post in news papers but now as I am
    a user of net therefore from now I am using net for posts, thanks to web.

  26. I do not even know how I stopped up right here, however I thought this put up used to be great.

    I don’t recognise who you’re but certainly you’re going to a famous
    blogger if you happen to aren’t already. Cheers!

  27. This is a topic that’s close to my heart… Many thanks!

    Where are your contact details though?

  28. I was suggested this blog by my cousin. I’m not certain whether this put up is written by
    him as no one else realize such distinctive approximately my difficulty.
    You’re wonderful! Thanks!

  29. I will right away seize your rss feed as I can not find your email subscription link or newsletter service.

    Do you have any? Please allow me recognize so that I could subscribe.

  30. Very energetic post, I enjoyed that bit. Will
    there be a part 2?

  31. I was pretty pleased to uncover this site. I
    want to to thank you for your time for this fantastic read!!
    I definitely appreciated every bit of it and I have you book marked to
    check out new information on your web site.

  32. Hi, i think that i saw you visited my weblog so i came to “return the favor”.I am attempting to find things to improve
    my web site!I suppose its ok to use some of your ideas!!

  33. Your means of telling the whole thing in this article is truly nice, every one be capable of effortlessly
    know it, Thanks a lot.

  34. This paragraph provides clear idea designed for the new users of blogging, that actually how to do

  35. Thank you for every other informative website. Where else may
    I am getting that type of information written in such an ideal manner?
    I’ve a mission that I’m just now running on, and I’ve been at the look out for such

  36. Hi there, I found your blog by the use of Google whilst searching
    for a similar topic, your web site got here up, it appears to be like great.
    I have bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.

    Hello there, just was aware of your blog through Google, and located that it
    is really informative. I am gonna watch out for brussels.

    I will appreciate in case you proceed this in future.
    Numerous people can be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  37. Ahaa, its fastidious conversation regarding this
    piece of writing at this place at this webpage, I have read all
    that, so now me also commenting at this place.

  38. Hi there to all, how is everything, I think every one is getting more from this site, and your
    views are good in support of new people.

  39. Good day! Do you know if they make any plugins to assist with SEO?
    I’m trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted keywords but I’m not seeing very good success.

    If you know of any please share. Kudos!

  40. Awesome! Its actually amazing paragraph, I have
    got much clear idea concerning from this piece
    of writing.

  41. hey there and thank you for your info – I’ve certainly picked
    up anything new from right here. I did however expertise a
    few technical issues using this website, since I experienced to reload the web site a lot of times previous to
    I could get it to load correctly. I had been wondering if your
    web hosting is OK? Not that I am complaining, but sluggish loading instances times will
    sometimes affect your placement in google and could
    damage your high-quality score if ads and marketing with Adwords.
    Well I am adding this RSS to my email and can look out for a lot more of your respective intriguing content.
    Make sure you update this again soon.

  42. Link exchange is nothing else except it is simply placing the other person’s webpage link on your page at proper place and
    other person will also do similar for you.

  43. Thanks for sharing your thoughts on Click here.

  44. This blog was… how do I say it? Relevant!! Finally I’ve found something which helped me.


  45. I have been exploring for a little for any high quality articles or
    blog posts on this kind of house . Exploring in Yahoo I eventually stumbled upon this web site.
    Studying this information So i am glad to express that I have a very good uncanny feeling
    I found out exactly what I needed. I such a lot undoubtedly will make
    certain to don?t forget this web site and give it a
    glance on a constant basis.

  46. It is actually a nice and useful piece of info. I’m satisfied that you just shared this
    helpful information with us. Please stay us informed like this.
    Thank you for sharing.

  47. With havin so much written content do you ever run into any
    issues of plagorism or copyright violation? My website has a lot of unique content I’ve either written myself or
    outsourced but it looks like a lot of it is popping it up all over the web without my agreement.
    Do you know any ways to help protect against content from being ripped off?
    I’d really appreciate it.

  48. constantly i used to read smaller articles or reviews that also clear their motive, and that is also happening
    with this piece of writing which I am reading now.

  49. Hi colleagues, its wonderful piece of writing concerning teachingand
    completely defined, keep it up all the time.

  50. We’re a group of volunteers and opening a new scheme in our
    community. Your web site offered us with valuable info to work on. You’ve done
    an impressive job and our entire community will be grateful to you.

  51. If some one wishes expert view regarding blogging then i advise
    him/her to pay a quick visit this blog, Keep up the good job.

  52. Hola! I’ve been following your weblog for a long time now
    and finally got the bravery to go ahead and give you a shout
    out from Kingwood Tx! Just wanted to say keep up the good work!

  53. I’m really enjoying the theme/design of your blog. Do you ever
    run into any web browser compatibility issues?

    A couple of my blog audience have complained about my website not working correctly in Explorer but looks great in Chrome.
    Do you have any advice to help fix this problem?

  54. Thanks for finally talking about > Searching for Truth in “The Truth Project” — Lesson 2:
    Philosophy & Ethics — Says Who? | Rethinking the
    αlpha and Ωmega < Loved it!

  55. Exceptional post but I was wanting to know if you could write a litte more on this topic?
    I’d be very thankful if you could elaborate a little bit further.
    Bless you!

  56. Hey There. I found your weblog the use of msn. This is a very well written article.

    I will be sure to bookmark it and come back to learn extra of your useful info.
    Thanks for the post. I’ll certainly return.

  57. Hello, its good post regarding media print, we all understand media is a impressive source of facts.

  58. I have read so many posts on the topic of the blogger lovers however this
    article is really a good piece of writing, keep it up.

  59. I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own blog and was wondering what
    all is required to get set up? I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny?
    I’m not very web smart so I’m not 100% certain. Any tips or advice would be greatly appreciated.

  60. This is a topic that is near to my heart… Best wishes!
    Where are your contact details though?

  61. Attractive section of content. I simply stumbled upon your website and
    in accession capital to assert that I get actually loved account your blog posts.

    Any way I will be subscribing to your augment and
    even I fulfillment you access constantly fast.

  62. I just couldn’t depart your website prior to suggesting that I
    actually loved the standard info a person provide for your guests?
    Is going to be again ceaselessly in order to investigate cross-check new posts

  63. There’s certainly a great deal to learn about this
    subject. I love all the points you have made.

  64. Appreciating the commitment you put into your site and in depth information you offer.
    It’s nice to come across a blog every once in a while that isn’t the same unwanted rehashed information. Fantastic read!
    I’ve bookmarked your site and I’m adding your RSS feeds to my Google account.

  65. I am not sure where you’re getting your info, but great topic.
    I needs to spend some time learning much more or understanding more.
    Thanks for great info I was looking for this info for my mission.

  66. Thanks for sharing your thoughts about rosenbären. Regards

  67. Attractive component of content. I simply stumbled upon your weblog and in accession capital to claim that I get actually loved
    account your weblog posts. Anyway I will be subscribing for your feeds or even I achievement you get
    admission to consistently quickly.

  68. Undeniably consider that that you said. Your favourite justification seemed to be at the internet the simplest thing to consider of.

    I say to you, I definitely get irked while other people think about worries that they plainly do
    not recognize about. You managed to hit the nail upon the
    highest and also outlined out the whole thing with no need
    side effect , other people can take a signal. Will likely
    be back to get more. Thanks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *